Workflows · Data & Analytics
Every applicant. Every evaluator. One master sheet — automatically.
Built for awards programs and scholarship committees — generate a personalized evaluation scorecard per applicant, distribute to your judges, and consolidate returned scores without touching a file.
The problem
You're the one building every scorecard. And chasing every judge.
Every award cycle starts the same way: duplicate the template, rename it for each applicant, fill in the details, repeat. Then scorecards trickle back from committee members at different times, in different formats, with different cells filled. By the time your selection committee meets, you’ve spent a full day on logistics that had nothing to do with the awards themselves.
Step 1 — Evaluation Distribution
Generate one scorecard per applicant. Instantly.
Upload your evaluation template. Map the applicant list. Cheatdeck generates a named, prefilled scorecard for every candidate — ready to send to your committee in a single batch.
- Accepts the Excel or Google Sheets evaluation template you already use
- Prefills applicant name, ID, category, and any identifying fields
- Generates one file per applicant in a single operation
- Preserves scoring rubrics, locked cells, and committee instructions
- Names files by your convention — applicant name, ID, or program year
- Outputs a send-ready folder organized for your distribution method
Step 2 — Score Consolidation
Collect returned scorecards. Consolidate into a ranked summary.
As completed evaluations come back from your selection committee or interview panel, Cheatdeck extracts scores and comments, normalizes inconsistencies, and builds a master sheet ready for your deliberation meeting.
- Detects structural changes evaluators made to the original scorecard
- Extracts scores, ratings, and qualitative comments by field name
- Normalizes inconsistent formats — merged cells, partial fills, varied date styles
- Flags missing scores or incomplete submissions for follow-up
- Consolidates all evaluator responses into a single ranked master sheet
- Supports multiple committee rounds — interview panels, selection committees — without overwriting prior scores
Common use cases
Built for programs that run structured evaluation cycles.
Awards programs, scholarship foundations, grant committees — any structured review where you're distributing and collecting the same form dozens of times.
Scholarship programs
Distribute applicant scorecards to each committee member. Collect completed evaluations and generate a ranked master for your selection meeting.
Interview & selection committees
Generate interview evaluation sheets per candidate per panelist. Consolidate scores after each round to produce a shortlist.
Grant & foundation reviews
Fan out scoring rubrics to each reviewer. When assessments come back, extract scores and narratives into one decision-ready master sheet.
Ready to run your next award cycle without the manual work?
Claim early access and we'll help you map your evaluation template and run your first fan-out.